Wait, how’s that now? That eliminates quite a few things. How is Greenberg not a for-profit group?
It’s not a for-profit LEGO-related group. It’s a for-profit model train group. Big difference, in the eyes of TLG. I think. I haven’t read the rules in a while…
I figured, but I wanted to make sure you guys avoid the whole putting-a-lot-of-effort-into-a-plan-that-isn’t-ever-going-to-work thing, cause I’ve already done that more than once with GBC.
Lulz. I mean… I’m sorry for your loss.
Thinking about this, maybe the LUG can’t use Brickfair because the “fan events” gets support, like sets to giveaway as prizes.
I believe that’s the gist of it – they don’t want to give support to both the event and the LUGs showing up at the event. Maybe.
Hi,
First timer to this thread, but long time member of the forum. Maybe I wasn’t tagged because I’m a newbie, or because my brain isn’t much for storming in recent days.
Lulz. I mean… I’m sorry for your loss.
Not to reset the thread entirely though, but I anticipate changes to the way LUG support will look and function in 2018. There have been official LEGO discussions for the past 6 months at AFOL conventions about the changes, though nothing set has been communicated. Though the initial description of requirements for lug support were misstated above (specifically, having to have a non-local event), I’d just recommend not progressing on plans that require LUG support consideration until we know what we’re dealing with. The plan to choose 3 specific events, to ensure the LUG is taking them seriously, is noted though, and will be discussed further at the Jan 6th meeting. I’m hoping we have more information to share by then.
I second that emotion.
This may be an easy selection for the quarterly build challenge, even though my individual build time is booked all the way up through 2019 at this point
Yes, we all saw your thread; no need to brag about it over here, too… 😉
P.S. I did not tag admins on this thread because I assumed you received all the messages regardless.
